(MountEverest.net) Among all the incomplete, inaccurate or plainly wrong statements from Shisha Pangma this season, Annelie Pompe and Johanna Öhrn’s story gets the cake: a chain of lies and forged images eventually boiling down to major embarrassment in their homeland Sweden.
By at first publicly claiming summit and then trying to defend the central point against all evidence, the women soon attracted the eyes of climbing experts.
Aided by local and international mountaineers, one Swedish climbing veteran finally did what the journalists failed: unveiling a mess of false statements, contradictions, and pictures both stolen and manipulated.
The story sports the usual hostility towards messengers of uncomfortable questions, media bias and in the end, a total lack of respect for readers, supporters and fellow climbers. The plot is so surreal that it would have been funny, had it not been so sad.
“I stand on the summit of wonderful Shisha Pangma, 8013 (sic) meter above the sea,” Swede Annelie Pompe, 28, was quoted in Swedish media on September 30th.
There was no doubt: “The summit is achieved,” mate Johanna Öhrn confirmed in her dispatch that same day.
And just to make sure: “Edmund Spoden from Belgium and Tashi Sherpa successfully summitted Mt. Shisha Pangma today, 30th Sept. 2009 without use of supplementary O2,” the team’s local outfitter Rolwaling Excursion chimed in.*
“Now there’s only the other mountain left,” Annelie went on. Prior to the expedition, Pompe had stated that she was aiming for a Shisha-Cho Oyu double header, to complete a “highest and deepest” record, which would include a deep dive in combination with the climb.
“…she is such a nice girl”
The two Swedish novices, a Belgian climber and one Sherpa had seemingly achieved a remarkable goal, succeeding where seasoned veterans such as Juanito Oiarzabal had failed. But for one detail: 8013 meters? Shisha Pangma is 8027 meters. What had happened to the remaining distance?
It took a while (and a number of heated emails from upset readers) for the media editors to at least correct Pompe to “Central Summit.”
Yet instead of investigating, journalists protected the climbers. One big mainstream newspaper simply removed a (polite) online correction post while an outdoor mag editor urged ExWeb about the popular Annelie, “be kind to her, she is such a nice girl.” Others minimized the error as a well-intended webmaster typo.
The tipping point
Lack of watchdog reporters was not new to local mountaineers. Six Swedes had been on or around Shisha’s fore summit before – five had declared success – only Fredrik Ericsson had made clear that this was actually not the “tippity top.” And who can forget Swedish Fredrik Strang’s heroic rescue claims from K2 last year.
But this time, the lack of factual proof and wild quotes proved too much even for the battered and sadly ignored flock of Swedish mountaineers trying to keep it real.
Adventurer and writer Janne Corax reported on his website: “I was expecting the usual Shisha lie: to claim a summit without specifying that the point reached is not the massif’s highest, but the easier, secondary central top. However, those summit calls were just the starting point for one of the biggest scandals in Sweden’s climbing History.”
The stolen summit pic
Annelie had said that rope was fixed to the very top, a fact indicating that she had only reached the ridge above C3. Comments followed on related blogs, mainly from increasingly skeptic readers demanding proof.
In result, a “summit pic” soon went up on Johanna’s blog – clearly picturing at least Shisha’s Central summit.
“Seems all OK,” ExplorersWeb editors concluded when asked to double check, “provided it’s them in the picture.”
Janne Corax did a quick Google search. “My first thought was: it’s amazing how fast Google indexes new images,” Corax wrote in his account. “Something was wrong with the picture though… the Google image showed someone in a red down overall, someone who was missing in Johanna’s image.”
“Astonished, I surfed back to Johanna’s blog. Sure, it was the same picture, but it had been manipulated.”
“I was flabbergasted. The original image showed four people; Johanna’s only three – one had been removed in order to make everything look right. Later I found out that the red-dressed figure was Nicola, a member in Jamie McGuinness’ P-H Shisha Pangma 2003 expedition.”
Sure enough, the image was from years before, and the climbers in it were not Johanna, Annelie and Edmund, but members in a 2003 Shisha Pangma expedition launched by NZ outfitter Project-Himalaya.
Meanwhile, the women headed for Cho Oyu. The attempt was called off a couple of days later due to bad weather. Johanna dispatched epic tales of 180km/h winds sweeping the mountain; a figure contradicted by other teams’ reports but illustrated by telling pictures on the expedition blog.
Again though, one photo of “climbers in a blizzard and flattened tents” was traced to the Leipzig 2005 Everest Expedition; another was from the Lhotse face shot by yet another climber. Further check of Annelie’s Shisha Pangma images showed they were all from her earlier Cho Oyu expedition, in no way explaining this.
Attack best defense?
At the time of editing this story, Annelie Pompe – the most publicized of the two women – was still active in Swedish online media, persisting in her claim of Central Summit.
On her blogs at Utsidan.se blog and Sweden’s edition of Outside Mag she jumps posters asking for explanations, blames poverty, sponsors and the media (she was forced to please them), and offers yet another summit image – this time showing all four climbers sitting on the alleged Central summit.**
“Tashi Sherpa said it was the Central peak, our altimeter showed 8008m (ed note: it’s unclear what happened to her original quote “8013 meter above the sea”) and the Chinese, who have a solid reputation (sic), said they were up to the Central peak,” Pompe insists.***
Finally, she posted a video as “ultimate summit proof” on Outside.se. Asked about his opinion, American Nick Rice was clear: “Still not the Central Summit… you can see the ridge to the Central Summit partially at around 16 seconds into the video (on the left side of the frame)… After the Central Summit, the ridge goes down slightly, not up… so they are STILL on the plateau just before the ridge to the Central Summit.”
*Ed note: Rolwaling recently added “Central Summit” on its home page.
**The 8008 “Central Summit” bump is heavily corniced and hardly has room for one climber to stand on, let alone four.
***The Chinese-Tibetan team only fixed rope up to the North Summit, SummitClimb’s leader Dan Mazur stated (check this series’ first part previously published on mountEverest.net).
The investigation’s core is available in “climbing-detective and self-appointed prosecutor ” Janne Corax’s blog posts. Here is the base-article and Corax’s answers (both in Swedish) to Annelie’s summit images and video.
The stolen images have been deleted on Johanna’s blog so please check the following screen dumps on Janne Corax’s blog:
Stolen photo from Jamie, #1
Stolen photo from Jamie, #2
Stolen “Cho Oyu image” on Johanna’s blog, actually showing Lhotse face – Original image
Flattened tents – manipulated – Original – Everest 2005
Photo claiming to be Cho Oyu
** Previous story :
Exweb Week-In-Review is sponsored by HumanEdgeTech the world’s premier supplier of expedition technology. Our team helps you find ultra light expedition tech that works globally.
e-mail or call +1 212 966 1928
* Read these stories – and more! – at ExplorersWeb.com
zapraszam do subskrypcji mego bloga
Filed under: Climbers, Expedition, Himalayas, Travel | Tagged: Annelie Pompe, Central Summit, Cho Oyu, Climbers, Everest, Expedition, Himalaya, Inaki Ochoa, Johanna Öhrn, Kinga Baranowska, Nick Rice, Shisha Pangma, stolen summit pic, SummitClimb, Travel, true summit special report, Tybet |